Armed Attorneys

Carry a Gun While Traveling: Navigating Federal Safe Passage and Challenges Across State Lines

2 years ago

Traveling across the United States with a gun can be a challenging endeavor due to the varying gun laws in different states, counties, and cities. However, the federal safe passage provision, found within the Firearm Owner's Protection Act, aims to provide some level of protection to gun owners during their journeys. In this article, we will delve into the details of this provision, its key elements, and the challenges gun owners may face when navigating through gun-unfriendly states.

Armed Attorneys

Legal Perils: Firearm Training Used Against Defendants in Self-Defense Cases

1 year ago

In recent years, a concerning trend has emerged within the legal system regarding firearm training and its potential impact on individuals facing legal charges in self-defense scenarios. This article delves into the various types of training that are making their way into courtrooms and explores whether individuals should reconsider their approach to training based on these evolving trends. The repercussions of this trend are far-reaching, affecting both law enforcement personnel and average civilians exercising their Second Amendment rights.

Armed Attorneys

Understanding Constructive Possession in ATF's Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces

1 year ago

The ATF's final rule on stabilizing braces has raised concerns and questions among gun owners regarding constructive possession. This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of constructive possession, its implications, and its relationship to the National Firearms Act (NFA) and the recent rule change on stabilizing braces.

Armed Attorneys

The Fight Continues: Challenges After Constitutional Carry

1 year ago

Constitutional carry, also known as permitless carry, has gained momentum across numerous states in the United States, giving law-abiding citizens the right to carry firearms without a permit. While the passage of constitutional carry laws is seen as a victory for gun rights advocates, it is essential to recognize that the fight for Second Amendment rights is far from over. This article delves into the challenges that arise after constitutional carry becomes law and highlights three critical battles that gun owners and rights advocates must focus on: protecting self-defense rights, establishing statutory preemption, and eliminating gun-free zones.

Armed Attorneys

ATF's Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces Faces Opposition from FPC, GOA, and GOF Lawsuits

1 year ago

The ATF's final rule on stabilizing braces has faced significant opposition from gun rights organizations, including Gun Owners of America (GOA), Gun Owners Foundation (GOF), and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC). These organizations have filed lawsuits seeking injunctions to prevent the implementation of the rule. In a recent development, the Fifth Circuit issued an injunction against the rule, suggesting a high likelihood of the plaintiffs' success. However, the scope of the injunction has caused confusion, leaving many wondering who exactly is covered by the court's ruling.

Armed Attorneys

ATF Final Rule on Braces Halted by New Injunction: Impact on Gun Owners

1 year ago

The ATF's final rule on stabilizing braces, which has sparked controversy and concern among gun owners, has faced another setback. Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) recently secured an injunction against the rule, providing temporary relief for their members and employees of the State of Texas. This development brings some clarity but also raises questions about the scope and implications of the injunction.

Armed Attorneys

Court Strikes Down 50-Year-Old Gun Law, Ignites Second Amendment Debate

1 year ago

In a recent court decision, the District Court struck down a longstanding gun law as unconstitutional, sparking an important discussion about Second Amendment rights. The case, Fraser versus the ATF, originated from the eastern district of Virginia and challenged a provision of the original Gun Control Act of 1968. This law prohibited individuals aged 18, 19, and 20 from purchasing handguns from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). The court's ruling raises questions about the constitutionality of age restrictions on firearms purchases and their implications for the future of gun control laws. This article explores the details of the case, the historical context of gun control legislation, and the potential impact of this decision on existing and future gun laws.

Armed Attorneys

Circuit Court Declares Felony Firearm Prohibition Unconstitutional

1 year ago

In a landmark decision, the Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a prohibition on firearm ownership for non-violent felons is unconstitutional. The case, styled Range v. Attorney General of the United States, challenged the long-standing practice of denying individuals their right to own a firearm based on non-violent felony convictions. The court's decision has sparked a debate about the blanket prohibition on firearm ownership and the need to differentiate between non-violent felons and those who have committed violent crimes.

Armed Attorneys

White House Pushes for More Gun Control Measures in Peculiar Address

1 year ago

In a recent speech at the Safer Community Summit, President Joe Biden discussed the future of gun control in the United States. The 30-minute address presented a mix of manipulative appeals to emotion, factual errors, and off-script moments, leaving viewers with a sense of confusion and concern about the President's mental state.

Armed Attorneys

Game Wardens Face Backlash for Violating Gun Owner's Fourth Amendment Rights

1 year ago

A recent incident involving game wardens and a gun owner in rural Virginia has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the erosion of Fourth Amendment rights. Josh Highlander, a resident of Virginia living on 30 acres of land, experienced the warrantless confiscation of his trail cameras by game wardens from the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources. This incident has reignited discussions about the Open Fields Doctrine, the authority of game wardens, and the need to protect individuals' constitutional rights.

Armed Attorneys

Supreme Court Case Threatens Second Amendment Rights

1 year ago

The potential impact of the Rahimi v. United States case

Armed Attorneys

Latest in Armed Attorneys