2A Law

Legal Challenges to Washington's Assault Weapon Ban and Call for Support

Video Highlights

  • William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides an update on the legal challenges to House Bill 1240, Washington's assault weapon ban.
  • One of the cases, Guardian Arms v Inslee, was initially filed in Grant County but has been transferred to Thurston County.
  • The hearing for the injunction in Thurston County Superior Court is scheduled for Friday, June 23rd, at 9:00 a.m.
  • Individuals who lawfully purchased a firearm but were denied possession due to the bill's enactment are encouraged to contact the silent majority Foundation and provide declarations outlining their experiences.
  • Assistance from the public is crucial in building constitutional challenges against the assault weapon ban.
  • The video is sponsored by Guardian Arms, a premier FFL located in Moses Lake, offering custom cerakoting and Gunsmithing services.

Video Summary

In a recent video, William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provided an important update on the legal challenges surrounding House Bill 1240, which implemented an assault weapon ban in the state of Washington. Kirk specifically discussed Guardian Arms v Inslee, a case initially filed in Grant County but later transferred to Thurston County for further proceedings.

According to Kirk, the hearing for the injunction in Thurston County Superior Court has been scheduled for Friday, June 23rd, at 9:00 a.m. However, he noted that the exact starting time might be subject to change, given the nature of court calendars. Kirk emphasized the significance of this hearing and stressed the need for support from the public.

One group of individuals requiring immediate attention and assistance are those who lawfully purchased a firearm but were subsequently denied possession due to the enactment of House Bill 1240. Kirk explained that during the waiting period or the time taken for the background check to come back, Governor Inslee signed the bill into legislation. Consequently, individuals who had completed the necessary paperwork, including the 44.73 form, paid their taxes, and fulfilled all legal requirements, found themselves unable to take possession of the firearm they had lawfully purchased.

To bolster the constitutional challenges against the assault weapon ban, Kirk urged affected individuals to contact the silent majority Foundation. The Foundation is seeking detailed declarations outlining the factual scenarios faced by those who were denied possession of their firearms due to the bill's enactment. Kirk provided the email address [email protected] as the means for individuals to reach out and contribute to the cause.

In terms of the legal proceedings, Kirk assured viewers that the Washington Gun Law team had coordinated with the silent majority Foundation. As soon as the hearing in Thurston County is concluded, the Foundation will provide them with the necessary information to create a follow-up video, informing the public about the outcome.

Throughout the video, Kirk reminded viewers about the importance of being a lawful and responsible gun owner. He emphasized the need to stay informed about the laws and how they apply in various situations. Kirk also provided contact information for Washington Gun Law in case viewers had further questions or required additional assistance.

The update video was sponsored by Guardian Arms, a well-known FFL located in Moses Lake. Along with standard sales, Guardian Arms offers custom cerakoting and Gunsmithing services. Kirk encouraged viewers to visit their YouTube channel, Guardian Arms Training, and explore the range of services they provide.

In conclusion, the legal challenges to Washington's assault weapon ban continue, with Guardian Arms v Inslee being a significant case to follow. The upcoming hearing in Thurston County Superior Court marks a crucial point in the proceedings. The silent majority Foundation seeks declarations from individuals who were lawfully denied possession of firearms due to the bill's enactment. The involvement and support of the public are vital in building a robust constitutional challenge against the assault weapon ban.