2A Law

NRA Seeks to Expand Injunctions Against ATF's Pistol Brace Rule, Protecting Millions of Gun Owners

Video Highlights

  • The NRA is seeking to join the SEF Garland case as a named plaintiff.
  • They allege that the NRA represents over 350,000 Texas members and millions of members nationwide who have an interest in the case.
  • The NRA is requesting an expanded preliminary injunction to protect their members from the ATF's pistol brace rule.
  • If granted, the injunction would be significant, as the NRA is the largest Second Amendment organization with a massive membership base.
  • The NRA is also funding the Frack lawsuit in North Dakota, aiming for similar injunctive relief.
  • The injunctions obtained by FBC, GOA, and SAF are currently in place, with the fifth circuit reviewing the denial of FBC's initial request for an injunction.

Video Summary

The National Rifle Association (NRA) has taken steps to expand the injunctions against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives' (ATF) pistol brace rule, aiming to protect millions of gun owners. In a motion to intervene filed in the SEF Garland case, the NRA seeks to join the lawsuit as a named plaintiff, representing its over 350,000 Texas members and more than 4 million members across the nation.

A motion to intervene is when an entity not originally involved in a lawsuit requests to join the case as a new party. The NRA alleges that its members' constitutional rights are being infringed upon by the ATF's final rule and seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to restrain the ATF and the Department of Justice (DOJ) from enforcing the rule.

The NRA's motion also calls for an expansion of the existing preliminary injunction to cover their organization and its members. This request aligns with the injunctions previously granted to organizations such as the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), Gun Owners of America (GOA), and Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) in related cases.

If the NRA's motion is successful, the injunction would provide crucial protection for millions of gun owners who may not be currently covered by other organizations. Despite some criticisms of the NRA's approach and impact, it remains the largest and most influential Second Amendment organization. The potential injunction in their favor would have far-reaching implications.

It is worth noting that the NRA is also providing financial support to the Frack lawsuit in North Dakota, although they are not a party or plaintiff in that case. The Frack lawsuit represents 25 states and seeks injunctive relief on behalf of their residents. However, the injunction obtained by Texas in their separate lawsuit did not extend to cover all residents within their borders, leaving the Frack case as a potential avenue for broader protection.

The upcoming expedited hearing on June 29th in the fifth circuit court will primarily focus on whether the district court judge, Reed O'Connor, erred in denying FBC's request for an injunction in the mock lawsuit. This hearing does not directly assess the merits of the entire case but rather determines whether the lower court's decision was justified.

It is crucial to note that even if the NRA's motion succeeds and an expanded preliminary injunction is granted, it will only remain in place temporarily until the fifth circuit reviews Judge O'Connor's denial. Proving that a judge abused their discretion is a challenging task, and it sets a high standard for the injunction to be upheld.

Nevertheless, if the NRA secures an injunction for its members, it would mark a significant milestone in protecting the rights of gun owners. Apart from the 25 states represented in the Frack lawsuit, the NRA's large membership base would receive the broadest coverage thus far.

In conclusion, multiple organizations, including FBC, GOA, SAF, and now the NRA, have sought injunctions to challenge the ATF's pistol brace rule. While opinions on the NRA's effectiveness may vary, their involvement in this case could provide extensive protection for millions of gun owners. As the legal proceedings continue, the fifth circuit hearing will play a pivotal role in determining the fate of the injunctions and the future of the pistol brace issue.