Video Highlights
- William Kirk from Washington Gun Law TV is in Rando Beach, Washington discussing a scathing dissenting opinion from the Ninth Circuit.
- He mentions a case where the plaintiff was successful before a three-judge panel but was overturned by the Ninth Circuit on Bon panel.
- The video is sponsored by Right to Bear, a legal protection service for self-defense situations.
- Right to Bear provides access to attorneys, no cap limits for defense, and covers various forms of self-defense.
- Viewers can get a 10% discount by visiting protectwiththebear.com and using the promo code WGL.
Video Summary
In a recent video by Washington gun law TV, President William Kirk delves into a scathing dissenting opinion that has caught his attention. Filmed at Rando Beach, Washington, Kirk discusses a case where the plaintiff initially found success before the three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit, only to have the full Ninth Circuit, known as the "cabal" by Kirk, intervene and overturn the decision. This move by the Ninth Circuit prompts Kirk to shed light on the questionable practices within the court system.
Kirk begins by emphasizing the uniqueness of the dissenting opinion, labeling it as one of the funniest he has ever come across. He expresses his eagerness to share his insights with his audience, despite being in between court dates. The focus of his discussion revolves around the Ninth Circuit's intervention in cases where a panel decision has already been made, a practice that he believes undermines the integrity of the judicial process.
Acknowledging the gravity of the situation, Kirk highlights the significance of legal protection for individuals exercising their right to self-defense. He introduces Right to Bear as a sponsor of the video, emphasizing the importance of having reputable legal representation in such cases. Kirk stresses that quality legal support is essential, and individuals should not compromise on this aspect when preparing to defend themselves in legal proceedings.
The promotional message is followed by Kirk's return to the core issue at hand - the Ninth Circuit's controversial practices. He refers to the court's actions as reaching a point where it is essentially "calling itself out" for its misconduct. Kirk's choice of words reflects his strong disapproval of the Ninth Circuit's interference in cases that have already been adjudicated by a panel of judges.
As the discussion unfolds, Kirk urges his viewers to be vigilant and proactive in safeguarding their rights, especially in the face of a legal system that he perceives as flawed. He underscores the importance of staying informed and seeking reliable legal assistance, such as that provided by Right to Bear, to navigate the complexities of legal proceedings effectively.
In conclusion, Kirk's impassioned address sheds light on the intricacies of the legal system, particularly within the Ninth Circuit, and underscores the critical need for individuals to equip themselves with the necessary resources to protect their rights. His sharp critique of the Ninth Circuit's actions serves as a call to action for viewers to prioritize their legal preparedness and advocate for a fair and just judicial process.
